We admit that the majority of articles about conflict minerals are not particularly exciting reading – including our own.
A recent exchange in the Forbes blog is different. While we take no position on the facts or opinions presented by either party, we do find this repartee far more interesting reading than we are accustomed to seeing on the topic.
Read the first piece here, the initial response here and the third installment here. Will there be more? We can only guess.
Posted in conflict minerals, EHS, Governance, HSE, sustainability
Tagged coltan, Conflict Minerals, Congo, corporate responsibility, csr, Dodd-Frank, DRC, EHS, Forbes, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, supply chain, sustainability, tantalum, tin, tungsten, wolframite