Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Study: Auditors Need Help With Risk

Although not specifically reflecting EHS auditing professionals, the PCAOB conducted a study to review how well third party auditors did in complying with Auditing Standard No. 5 during 2008, the standard’s first full year of effectiveness.  Auditing Standard No. 5, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements (“Auditing Standard No. 5”), was promulgated in response to the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation and is intended to address the practice of independent financial/accounting auditing professionals.

One of the main areas of PCOAB’s review of AS5 was how well auditors focused their efforts on the most important audit components, based on their identification/understanding of the risks posed.  CFO Magazine said about the study that the PCAOB found

cases in which auditors didn’t identify variability in risk levels at a company’s different locations. Also, some audits did not consider how deficient controls could affect their risk evaluations.

Financial auditing has been highly regulated and scrutinized for many years – certainly much more so in the past 5 years.  Yet even in light of that, financial auditors appear to need support and guidance in applying the concept of “risk” and the failure of risk controls.

The results of this study provoke thought for EHS auditors – how well versed are we on the concept of “risk” and the failure of risk controls?


One response to “Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Study: Auditors Need Help With Risk

  1. The PCAOB should have more frequent reviews of this nature. The likelihood is strong that internal auditors would never be able to deliver what they are claiming to be expert about for as long as the commercialization of the audit practice remain t in the hands of the external auditors.

    For as long as form preceeds substance and profit preceeds morality of service, among the supposed guardians of the auditing profession, we will always have the likes of Enron around.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s