Join us for an upcoming webinar Friday, February 25 about using the iPad in HSE audits. We will present an overview of our experiences in using the device on actual audits over the past 6 months.
Included in the presentation will be a discussion of
- evaluating its potential use and fit within organizations/existing audit processes;
- benefits and limitations; and
- a detailed step-by-step simulation of an audit using Elm’s selected application (smartNotes), including actual screen shots.
The hour-long presentation will be followed by an open question and answer period.
Click here for a full description. There will be a morning session and an afternoon session. Click here for the afternoon session.
We hope you can participate.
Posted in Auditing, Compliance, EHS, Environment, H&S, Health & Safety, Risk, sustainability
Tagged audit, auditing, EHS, Environment, HSE, iPad, protocol, Safety
Following a successful implementation of the iPad for HSE auditing, Elm is today rolling out environmental compliance audit protocol modules for field testing this week.
“We believe this is the first formal environmental audit protocol implemented in the iPad form factor,” said Lawrence Heim, Director of Elm’s Georgia operations and the firm’s lead for iPad service development.
The protocols are reflective of a traditional paper-based format proven in the field over a number of years. Modules selected for field testing are waste generation, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know (“EPCRA”) and ozone depleting substances.
“In our view, this as a potentially dramatic step forward in HSE auditing. While version one does not automatically generate audit findings or reports, it has other significant strengths in addition to the benefits already seen by Elm from iPad implementation,” Heim said.
Elm highlights the following features:
- Flexibility. The protocol can be used in a manner matching auditors’ own personal styles in collecting audit data. Handwritten notes are captured in any format, including different “ink” colors, “highlighters”, and line weighting. While the initial protocol version is based on Elm’s standard audit process, other custom formats can be developed virtually without limitation.
- Adaptability. Elm’s iPad HSE protocol can be used alongside existing audit systems for initial data capture and organization prior to entering the information into less user friendly, highly structured audit systems. Also, the resulting PDF file can be attached into other HSE audit systems as supporting documentation.
- Merging related documents into the protocol. Documents such as state regulations, permits, plans, applications, agency correspondence and enforcement agreements can be incorporated into the protocol itself without effort of retyping, restructuring or reformatting. Once the appropriate document is merged, auditors are able to write notes and highlight text directly in the document. Further, by using a cellphone camera, additional documents can be captured and merged into the protocol in a few minutes while on-site.
- Languages. The iPad application in which the protocol was created can drastically reduce the need to translate audit protocols and related documents between languages. Audit documents are captured in their source format and original language, eliminating language translation costs/errors and allowing auditors to use their local language.
“We fully expect a successful test, with only minor changes to Version 1 being necessary. Additional environmental compliance modules are already in initial stages, awaiting our assessment of the field trials. Health and safety modules will be developed soon after,” Heim stated.
Posted in Auditing, Compliance, EHS, H&S, Health & Safety, HSE, Safety
Tagged audit, auditing, EHS, Environment, environmental, environmental compliance, EPA, H&S, HSE, internal audit, internal controls, iPad, OSHA, protocol, Safety
We recently announced our trial of and results from using an iPad for EHS auditing. These articles were intentionally short and provided summary information.
We were subsequently contacted by the Editor of EHS Journal to provide a more detailed article for their respected publication. That article is now available.
We invite you to read it.
Posted in Auditing, Compliance, EHS, H&S, Health & Safety, HSE, risk assessment
Tagged audit, auditing, compliance management, EHS, Environment, environmental, environmental compliance, environmental risk, health and safety, HSE, internal audit, iPad, risk management, Safety
OSHA has released the directive concerning its Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP). It can be read here.
Posted in Auditing, Compliance, EHS, H&S, Health & Safety, HSE, risk management, Safety
Tagged compliance management, EHS, enforcement, Health & Safety, health and safety, OSHA, risk management, Safety, severe violators, SVEP
The law firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP has published details about the upcoming OSHA Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP). The SVEP has been in development for more than a year, but Morgan Lewis indicated that a 27-page draft Directive was sent from OSHA to state officials in early April.
Highlights from the Morgan Lewis review:
According to the draft Directive, the SVEP will “focus increased enforcement attention on significant hazards and violations” by concentrating on employers that have demonstrated “indifference” to workplace safety obligations through willful, repeated, or failure-to abate-violations in four areas: (1) fatality or catastrophe situations; (2) industries that expose employee to the most severe hazards, including those identified in the draft Directive as “High-Emphasis Hazards”; (3) industries that expose employees to the potential release of highly hazardous chemicals; and (4) egregious enforcement actions. Once an employer is selected for the SVEP, OSHA will undertake a number of enforcement steps including enhanced follow-up inspections as well as inspections at other worksites of that same employer, potentially on a nationwide basis…
OSHA will consider any inspection that meets one or more of the following criteria as a candidate for the SVEP:
- Fatality/Catastrophic Criteria. A fatality/catastrophe inspection in which OSHA finds one or more willful or repeated citations or failure-to-abate notices based on a serious violation related to the death of an employee or three or more employee hospitalizations. Violations under this section do not need to be classified as “High-Emphasis Hazards.”
- Nonfatality/Noncatastrophic High-Emphasis Hazards. An inspection that finds two or more willful or repeated violations or failure-to-abate notices based on high-gravity, serious violations due to a High-Emphasis Hazard. A “High-Emphasis Hazard” is one based on a fall or a specific National Emphasis Program (NEP) identified in the draft, and thus includes (1) fall hazards under general industry, construction, shipyard, marine terminal, and longshoring standards; (2) amputation hazards; (3) combustible dust hazards; (4) crystalline silica hazards; (5) lead hazards (based on sampling); (6) excavation and trenching hazards; and (7) ship-breaking hazards.
- Nonfatality/Noncatastrophic Hazards Due to the Potential Release of a Highly Hazardous Chemical—Process Safety Management (PSM). An inspection that finds three or more willful or repeated violations or failure-to-abate notices based on high-gravity, serious violations related to petroleum refinery hazards, i.e., hazards covered by the petroleum refinery PSM NEP and hazards associated with the potential release of highly hazardous chemicals, as defined by the PSM Covered Chemical Facilities NEP.
… Placement into the SVEP will trigger a number of serious consequences for employers. While actions taken against an employer will be judged on a case-by-case basis, SVEP employers may be targeted for:
- Enhanced, Broad Follow-Up Inspections. Follow-up inspections of the cited workplace will be conducted after the citation becomes a final order, even if abatement verification has been received. In other words, these follow-up inspections are not limited in scope to whether the identified hazard has been abated, but will also include an assessment of whether the employer is engaging in similar violations. For Construction Industry worksites that close before a follow-up investigation can be conducted, at least one of the employer’s other worksites will be inspected.
- Nationwide Inspections. Where the agency has reason to believe that a citation is part of a broader pattern of noncompliance, OSHA will conduct inspections at related worksites of that employer.
- Egregious Violations. All “egregious” enforcement actions—cases where OSHA has alleged instance-by-instance violations of a particular standard—will be considered SVEP cases…
…while OSHA has not announced an implementation date for the SVEP, employers should take the time now, before its implementation, to audit their safety programs to ensure that they are not identified as repeat offenders under the program.
Employers should consider taking the following steps, among others, with counsel:
- Audit recent citations to ensure (1) that steps to abate those violations have been completed, and (2) that similar problems do not exist in facilities that were not inspected. Employers that adopt a multi-facility curative process for violations, rather than instituting a site-specific, temporary “fix,” may be less likely to receive further citations under the SVEP.
- Identify worksites with High-Emphasis Hazards and/or PSM hazards, and audit safety practices against OSHA’s NEPs in these areas. These areas of emphasis—from falls to combustible dust hazards—encompass a wide-ranging target group for OSHA enforcement moving forward. These are particularly vulnerable areas for employers, because the hazards themselves are often difficult to identify and abate from a safety perspective…
With the recent catastrophes in the mining and offshore oil industries, companies should expect OSHA to move swiftly and firmly with their new enforcement program.
Posted in Auditing, Compliance, EHS, H&S, Health & Safety, HSE, risk assessment, risk management, Safety
Tagged accidents, enforcement, Health & Safety, health and safety, HSE, incidents, loss avoidance, OSHA, risk management, Safety, severe violators, SVEP
Today Reuter’s reported that President Obama is ordering the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) to step up safety inspections and enforcement of mines.
This action comes as the Administration’s response to the Massey coal mine explosion in West Virginia last week that killed 29 miners.
Posted in Auditing, H&S, Health & Safety, HSE, Risk, risk assessment, risk management
Tagged compliance management, Health & Safety, health and safety, internal controls, mine safety, mines, mining, MSHA, OSHA, risk management, Safety
The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) today announced it is issuing $87,430,000 in proposed penalties to BP Products North America Inc. for the company’s failure to correct potential hazards faced by employees. The fine is the largest in OSHA’s history. The prior largest total penalty, $21 million, was issued in 2005, also against BP.
BP entered into a settlement agreement with OSHA in September 2005, under which the company agreed to corrective actions to eliminate potential hazards similar to those that caused the 2005 tragedy. Today’s announcement comes at the conclusion of a six-month inspection by OSHA, designed to evaluate the extent to which BP has complied with its obligations under the 2005 agreement and OSHA standards.
For noncompliance with the terms of the settlement agreement, the BP Texas City Refinery has been issued 270 “notifications of failure to abate” with fines totaling $56.7 million. Each notification represents a penalty of $7,000 times 30 days, the period that the conditions have remained unabated. OSHA also identified 439 new willful violations for failures to follow industry-accepted controls on the pressure relief safety systems and other process safety management violations with penalties totaling $30.7 million.
Posted in Auditing, Compliance, EHS, H&S, Health & Safety, HSE, risk management, Safety
Tagged audit, BP, compliance management, EHS, H&S, Health & Safety, health and safety, loss avoidance, OSHA, risk management, Safety, Texas City